Sure didn't take long to find out what Berkshire Hathaway (BRKa) would buy next.
Even with the 28% premium to Lubrizol's closing price on Friday, it looks like Buffett paid just over 12x the previous year's earnings for the company.
A good overview of Lubrizol from WSJ's Deal Journal:
Nearly three-quarters of Lubrizol's revenue comes from its "additives" segment, which churns out goo to keep humming engine oil and fluids for passenger cars, big diesel engines, power tools, hydraulics and other working machine parts.
While certainly a large purchase, Lubrizol is relatively small compared to Berkshire Hathaway:
Lubrizol pulled in $5.4 billion in revenue for 2010, compared to Berkshire’s more than $136 billion in revenue over the same time period. Lubrizol had about 6,900 workers at the end of last year, and facilities in 27 countries around the world, many of them laboratories where it cooks up new work. Berkshire employed about 260,000 people.
Some other articles on the deal:
Buffett had the following to say in the Berkshire Hathaway News Release:
"Lubrizol is exactly the sort of company with which we love to partner – the global leader in several market applications run by a talented CEO, James Hambrick," said Warren Buffett, Berkshire Hathaway chief executive officer. "Our only instruction to James – just keep doing for us what you have done so successfully for your shareholders."
I guess now we know just how itchy that trigger finger was.
Adam
This site does not provide investing recommendations as that comes down to individual circumstances. Instead, it is for generalized informational, educational, and entertainment purposes. Visitors should always do their own research and consult, as needed, with a financial adviser that's familiar with the individual circumstances before making any investment decisions. Bottom line: The opinions found here should never be considered specific individualized investment advice and never a recommendation to buy or sell anything.
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Applying Newton's Fourth Law
Origin of Newton's 4th Law?
"Long ago, Sir Isaac Newton gave us three laws of motion, which were the work of genius. But Sir Isaac's talents didn't extend to investing: He lost a bundle in the South Sea Bubble, explaining later, 'I can calculate the movement of the stars, but not the madness of men.' If he had not been traumatized by this loss, Sir Isaac might well have gone on to discover the Fourth Law of Motion: For investors as a whole, returns decrease as motion increases." - Warren Buffett
---
Find good businesses; buy at nice discounts to value; stay within limits & stick to what's understandable (necessarily unique for each investor); minimize trading, frictional costs, & errors of all kinds.
Blog Archive
-
▼
2011
(269)
-
▼
March
(24)
- Oil's Endless Bid
- Klarman: Trophy Properties vs Fixer-Uppers
- Buffett: 57% Return on Equity Capital - Berkshire ...
- Barron's Interview: Donald Yacktman
- Immutable Laws of Investing
- The Beer Industry's Bright Spot
- Buffett, Munger, and the 90% Tax
- Buffett: "Two Types of Assets"
- Is Japan a Buying Opportunity?
- Wells Fargo, JP Morgan, & U.S. Bancorp Increase Di...
- David Herro, The Contrarian
- Buffett, Bogle, and the Invisible Foot
- Is Dell a Bargain?
- Ray Dalio on Stocks & Commodities
- Buffett Uses Elephant Gun, Buys Lubrizol for $ 9 B...
- Wells Fargo to Devote 30% of Earnings to Dividend
- Black-Scholes and the Flat Earth Society: 2010 Ber...
- Google Cranks Up the M&A
- Buffett on Railroads
- Why You Don't Need More Energy Stocks
- 2010 Berkshire Shareholder Letter: $ 66 Billion in...
- Defensive Stocks Revisited
- Berkshire's Elephant Gun is Loaded
- Berkshire Hathaway's Equity Portfolio: Beyond the ...
-
▼
March
(24)
About The Site
This site is for generalized informational purposes only and the views found here should never be considered specific investment advice.
Visitors should always do their own homework and consult, as needed, with a personal financial adviser who understands their specific individual circumstances before taking action on any particular investing idea. What makes sense as an investment in one set of individual circumstances may not in another.
Opinions found on the blog are just that, opinions, could easily be wrong in all kinds of ways, and should never be considered advice that is specific in nature. Stocks and other investment vehicles are inherently filled with risks including the possibility, or even likelihood, of permanent loss of capital. Past performance, of course, should not be considered indicative of future results. Due diligence is necessary.
The content found here shall not be taken as a recommendation to buy or sell any security or to participate in any particular investment strategy. Again, that necessarily comes down to individual circumstances. So, in other words, there is no personal financial adviser here, just some opinions and views. These opinion and views are subject to change at any time and, since they are not individualized in any way, consultation with an investment professional and doing one's own rigorous research/analysis before making any investment decisions is essential.
All posts are simply presented as one view on investing and some related topics though never specific recommendations. An investor should always get help from an investment professional if they feel they need it and, most importantly, before mistakes are made. Ultimately, the actions of individual investors, whether they happen to be a visitor to this site or not, are their own responsibility (and, if applicable, so are the associated losses). While there will always be a very real risk of permanent capital loss in investing, those who know their own limits and ask for professional advice when they require it can improve their chances substantially. Investors should never buy or sell a security based upon what they've read on any blog.
Information on this site is believed to be accurate yet may include errors or omissions and is not guaranteed. The site is also never a solicitation or offer to buy or sell any securities.
Posts on this blog do not offer opinions on the future price action of specific stocks or the capital markets as a whole. Instead, the focus is sound investing principles but never predictions or recommendations. It's understanding productive assets and their likely intrinsic value; how they may or may not compound in intrinsic worth over a long time horizon. It's about investing with a comfortable margin of safety. It's NOT about speculating on price action. In the near-term, or even longer, the market price of an asset can do just about anything.
A temperamental market pretty much assures it.
Those with a long investing horizon, it's worth noting, actually benefit from lower stock prices in the near-term (though not many market participants seem willing to put this truism to effective use). Those who attempt to profit primarily via speculating on short-term price action likely won't find this way of thinking to be of much interest.
The bottom line: This site does not provide individual investment advice of any kind and the blog posts found here are never a recommendation to buy or sell anything. Visitors should start with the assumption that the ideas found here are not good ones and do their own homework (or get individualized help from an investment professional) before taking ANY action.
Otherwise, hopefully some occasionally find the site worthwhile.
Labels
- Banks (90)
- Berkshire Shareholder Letter Highlights: 1977-86 (32)
- Berkshire Shareholder Letter Highlights: 1987-96 (35)
- Berkshire Shareholder Letter Highlights: 1997-06 (33)
- Berkshire Shareholder Letter Highlights: 2007-Present (49)
- Bogle (72)
- Buffett (514)
- Commodities (14)
- Consumer Goods (48)
- Economics (77)
- Graham (16)
- Grantham (47)
- Humor (3)
- Investing (244)
- Munger (224)
- Mutual Funds and ETFs (69)
- Quotes (81)
- Six Stock Portfolio (12)
- Sports (6)
- Stocks (396)
- Stocks to Watch (12)
- Technology (108)
- Yacktman (26)
Links
This site's emphasis? Put simply, it's on finding and buying -- with the long-term in mind -- good businesses at a plain discount to conservatively estimated value; it's on selling shares of those well-bought high quality business reluctantly. The view here is that selling makes sense only when core economics become permanently impaired, prospects have been misjudged, market price not just somewhat but, instead, meaningfully exceed per share intrinsic value, or opportunity costs are high. Buy/sell decisions aren't just an opportunity to increase returns; they're also an opportunity to make mistakes. It's easy to overemphasize the former and forget the latter. The focus here is on minimizing trading, frictional costs, and errors of all kinds; it's on staying comfortably within realistically assessed limits. First and foremost is the view that an investor should never make a specific investment based upon what someone else thinks. In other words, what makes sense to own is necessarily unique for each investor and it'd be unwise to not act accordingly. So, more generally, this site simply attempts to better understand some useful principles and ideas in context of investment. It's about, in a practical sense, what tends to work over the long haul as well as what, at times, gets the investor into trouble. It's not about grand theories in finance and economics. These too often distract from what matters or, worse yet, lead to costly misjudgments. As a result, they are mostly viewed with a healthy dose of skepticism here. Otherwise, the best thinking across disciplines should be learned well then put to good use in a way that's uniquely suitable.
About
Notable Quote
"Warren and I have not made our way in life by making successful macroeconomic predictions and betting on our conclusions.
Our system is to swim as competently as we can and sometimes the tide will be with us and sometimes it will be against us. But by and large we don't much bother with trying to predict the tides because we plan to play the game for a long time.
I recommend to all of you exactly the same attitude.
It's kind of a snare and a delusion to outguess macroeconomic cycles... ...very few people do it successfully and some of them do it by accident. When the game is that tough, why not adopt the other system of swimming as competently as you can and figuring that over a long life you'll have your share of good tides and bad tides?" - Charlie Munger
Our system is to swim as competently as we can and sometimes the tide will be with us and sometimes it will be against us. But by and large we don't much bother with trying to predict the tides because we plan to play the game for a long time.
I recommend to all of you exactly the same attitude.
It's kind of a snare and a delusion to outguess macroeconomic cycles... ...very few people do it successfully and some of them do it by accident. When the game is that tough, why not adopt the other system of swimming as competently as you can and figuring that over a long life you'll have your share of good tides and bad tides?" - Charlie Munger